Open Access

Good outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgical resection for a large radiation-induced high-grade breast sarcoma

  • Claudio Almeida Quadros1Email author,
  • Alessandro Vasconcelos2,
  • Roque Andrade2,
  • Rogério Santos Ramos3,
  • Eduardo Studart4,
  • Geraldo Nascimento1 and
  • André Trajano5
International Seminars in Surgical Oncology20063:18

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7800-3-18

Received: 23 January 2006

Accepted: 07 July 2006

Published: 07 July 2006

Abstract

This article is a case report of a high grade, radio-induced, breast malignant fibrous histiocytoma (undifferentiated high grade pleomorphic sarcoma), which developed in a 44-year old female, seven years after breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy for a T1N0M0 invasive left breast ductal carcinoma. The sarcoma presented as a fast growing tumour, 9.5 cm in the largest diameter, with skin, left breast, chest wall muscle and rib invasion.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed with epirubicin and ifosfamide. Extended radical surgery according to oncological standards and soft tissue reconstruction were carried out. Despite bad prognostic features of high grade and large invasive sarcoma, the patient is currently, after 44 months of follow up, without local recurrence, or metastases, exceeding the 12.8-month mean recurrence period and mortality rate for these tumours larger than 8.1 cm (± 1.2 cm) as described in the literature.

Background

External radiotherapy has now become standard following breast conservative surgery. Despite this, the occurrence of radiation-induced sarcoma is still reported as a rare complication, with incidence ranging from 0.008% to 0.48% [14]. Radio-induced breast sarcoma has a poor prognosis with a 68% recurrence rate after resection, and mean recurrence period of 12.8 months (median = 7.5 months) [5]. Regarding survival, reported mortality rate is 67.6% at a mean of 61.4-month follow-up [5], with a five-year survival rate ranging from 27.7% to 36% [4, 6, 7].

Angiosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma and oesteosarcoma are the most frequent histopathogical types of radiation-induced breast sarcoma published in the English-language literature [46, 8, 9].

Case report

A 44-year-old woman was admitted in May 2002 at our unit with a fast growing tumour in her left breast. Clinical evaluation revealed a lesion more than 10 cm in its maximum diameter, occupying the whole breast. The tumour had grossly infiltrated the skin and was fixed to the chest wall (figure 1 and 2). Incisional biopsy revealed the tumour to have high-grade spindle cell morphology and negative epithelial immunohistochemical markers, compatible with sarcoma (figure 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Radio-induced breast sarcoma, front view.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Preoperative lateral view.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (hematoxylin and eosin section).

Subsequent thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an expansive lesion of left breast and chest wall origin, infiltrating the skin and invading the pectoralis major and minor muscles, and the 7th – 9th ribs (figures 4 and 5). Thoracic and abdominal Computed Tomography did not identify any metastases.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Thorax Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showing tumor invading anteriorly the skin and posteriorly ribs and pleura.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Sagittal view of thorax MRI, tumor invading breast and chest wall.

The patient had been treated seven years earlier for a left breast ductal carcinoma T1N0M0 invasive, and well differentiated. The treatment had consisted of a local 1.5 cm tumour excision in the left superior quadrant of the left breast with ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection. Histological examination of the 29 lymph nodes excised was negative for malignant cells. Post-operative external beam radiotherapy was initiated 27 days after the surgery. It was applied to the remaining left breast, left axilla, supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary chain lymph nodes. The total 55 Gy radiation dose was delivered in 25 fractions, during a 5-week period, using a 3-field technique, in a Cobalt unit. The treatment ended in August 1994 with no adjuvant chemotherapy, and she had remained disease-free.

Neoadjuvant treatment for the high-grade sarcoma was initiated in June 2002, together with intravenous epirubicin, in a bolus dose of 60 mg/m2 from day D1 to D2, and ifosfamide, intravenous dose of 1800 mg/m2 from day D1 to D5 [9, 10]. Anaemia, leucopoenia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were the main adverse effects, with decreased leukocyte counts to 400 per mm3. Four sessions of chemotherapy were taken with 21-day intervals. At the end of the second session, clinical evidences of approximately 20% decrease in tumour diameter and resolution of the adjacent satellite lesions were observed.

Surgery was performed in October 31st, 2002, according to oncological standards. Total radical mastectomy with chest wall en bloc resection was carried out. The oncological principle was to totally excise the tumour-infiltrated tissue with cancer cell-free margins of at least 2 cm. A large portion of the skin extending from the sternum to the left axilla and from the left clavicle to the 10th left rib was resected. As the dissection was taken deep, the breast, pectoralis major and minor muscles, part of the serratus anterior muscle and the 7th to 9th ribs and pleura were removed en bloc (figure 6 and 7). A large soft tissue and chest wall defect required surgical reconstruction.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Anterior view of the surgical specimen showing skin invasion.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Ribs resection in the posterior view of the surgical specimen.

The principles of chest wall reconstruction were to provide obliteration of intra-thoracic dead space, skeletal stabilization and adequate soft tissue coverage. A 20 × 10 cm prolene mesh, covered by transposition and rotation of well vascularized regional muscle flaps, was used for skeletal stabilization. The mobilized muscles were the contralateral pectoralis major, keeping free the serratus anterior and the ipsilateral latissimus dorsi muscles. Adequate soft tissue coverage was achieved advancing and rotating an extensive thoracic-abdominal fasciocutaneous flap (figure 8). The reconstruction maintained normal respiration physiology, protected thoracic viscera and provided soft tissue coverage.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Result of radical surgical resection with oncological standards and reconstruction.

Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed a 9.5 × 9.0 × 8.5 cm high-grade breast and chest wall sarcoma invading the skin anteriorly and three ribs, pectoralis muscles and portion of the serratus muscle posteriorly. Histological evaluation revealed marked cytological and nuclear pleomorphism, often with bizarre tumour giant cells, occasionally multinuclear, combined with spindle cells and necrosis. Immunohistochemical examination showed tumour cells were reactive for vimentin. Stains were negative for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), actin (HHF-35, IA4), calponin, myo-D1, S100 protein, CD34 and CD31. These immunohistochemical and histopathological findings allowed a diagnosis of undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma (pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma).

Presence of 20% of necrosis in the surgical specimen was an important finding of the histological examination, which had not been observed at incisional biopsy performed prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (figure 9).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7800-3-18/MediaObjects/12956_2006_Article_49_Fig9_HTML.jpg
Figure 9

Presence of necrosis in 20% of the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The patient is currently in good health with no recurrence and breast reconstruction is being planned.

Discussion

It is well known that ionizing radiation can induce sarcoma [1, 8]. Cahan et al in 1948 defined the criteria for post-radiation bone sarcoma [12]. The requirements are: (a) evidence of an initial distinct malignant tumour different from the subsequent sarcoma, (b) development of the second malignant tumour in an irradiated field, (c) long interval between irradiation and development of sarcoma, and (d) histological confirmation of sarcoma [9]. This case report fulfils all these criteria.

Prognostic factors leading to poor outcome in breast radio-induced sarcomas are large and high-grade tumours, as described previously. In a study with 34 individuals with localized disease at the time of the surgery, tumour mean diameters of 7.9 cm ± 0.9 (n = 11) had malignant recurrences, with 12.8-month ± 10.6 (median = 7.5 months) mean recurrence period, while those with mean diameters of 3.3 cm ± 1.5 (n = 4) did not (p = 0,021) [5]. Patients who were alive without evidence of cancer had a mean tumour size of 4.2 cm ± 0.77, whereas those who died of the disease had mean tumour size 8.1 cm ± 1.2 tumours (p = 0.030) [5]. In a series of 80 radio-induced sarcoma patients, composed of 42% of breast treated patients, histological grade 2 sarcomas had a 5-year survival rate of 62%, compared to 19% survival rate in grade 3 (high grade) sarcomas (p < 0.01) [8].

The unsatisfactory results of recurrence and mortality rates of large and high grade radio-induced breast and chest wall sarcomas may have led oncologists worldwide not to consider extended surgical resection. Reasons include literature evidence of unfavourable prognosis, patient morbidity caused by the amount of removed surgical tissue. Palliative chemotherapy has been the mainstay of management in these situations. This case report indicates that patients with large and high-grade radiation-induced breast sarcomas can be offered a curative treatment. The reported patient has already survived 44 months of follow-up without evidence of malignancy, despite the presence of bad prognostic features, surpassing the recurrence range period described in the literature for patients with high-grade and large (9.5 cm) tumours [5].

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Surgical Oncologist, Oncological Society of Bahia – ONCO
(2)
Clinical Oncologist, Oncological Society of Bahia – ONCO
(3)
Plastic Surgeon, Federal University of Bahia
(4)
Pathologist, Silvany Studart Pathology Laboratory
(5)
Thoracic Surgeon, Portuguese Hospital

References

  1. Huang J, Mackillop WJ: Increased risk of tissue sarcomas after radiotherapy in women with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001, 92: 172-80. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<172::AID-CNCR1306>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Karlsson P, Holmberg E, Samuelsson , et al: Soft tissue sarcoma after treatment for breast cancer – a Swedish population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 1998, 34: 2068-75. 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00319-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Taghian A, de Vathaire F, Terrier P, et al: Long-term risk of sarcoma following radiation treatment for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991, 21: 361-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kirova YM, Vilcoq JR, Asselain B, et al: Radiation-Induced Sarcomas after Radiotherapy for Brest Carcinoma. A large-scale single-institution review. Cancer. 2005, 104 (4): 856-63. 10.1002/cncr.21223.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard DK, Reynolds C, Grant CS, et al: Radiation-induced breast sarcoma. Am J Surg. 2002, 184 (4): 356-8. 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00943-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yap J, Chuba PJ, Thomas R, et al: Sarcoma as a second malignancy after treatment for breast cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2002, 52 (5): 1231-7. 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02799-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady MS, Garfein CF, Petrek JA, et al: Post-treatment sarcoma in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994, 1: 66-77. 10.1007/BF02303543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagrange JL, Ramaioli A, Chateau MC, et al: Sarcoma after radiation therapy: retrospective multi-institucional study of 80 histologically confirmed cases. Radiology. 2000, 216: 197-205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Monroe AT, Feigenberg SJ, Mendenhall NP: Angiosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 2003, 97: 1832-40. 10.1002/cncr.11277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meric F, Milas M, Hunt KK, et al: Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity in soft tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18 (19): 3378-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frustaci S, Gherlinzoni F, De Paoli A, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy for adult soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and girdles: results of the Italian randomized cooperative trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19 (5): 1238-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cahan WG, Woodward HQ, Higinbotham NL, et al: Sarcoma arising in irradiated bone. Cancer. 1948, 1: 3-29. 10.1002/1097-0142(194805)1:1<3::AID-CNCR2820010103>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Quadros et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement