Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

International Seminars in Surgical Oncology

Open Access

Laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy or sampling in a high-risk series of patients with endometrial cancer

International Seminars in Surgical Oncology20063:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-28

Received: 23 May 2006

Accepted: 13 September 2006

Published: 13 September 2006

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to determine the outcome of all patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy at our institution, many of whom were high-risk for surgery.

Methods

Data was collected by a retrospective search of the case notes and Electronic Patient Records of the thirty eight patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer at our institutions.

Results

The median body mass index was 30 (range 19–67). Comorbidities were present in 76% (29 patients); 40% (15 patients) had a single comorbid condition, whilst 18% (7 patients) had two, and a further 18% (7 patients) had more than two. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 45% (17 patients), and lymph node sampling in 21% (8 patients). Median operating time was 210 minutes (range 70–360 minutes). Median estimated blood loss was 200 ml (range 50–1000 ml). There were no intraoperative complications. Post-operative complications were seen in 21% (2 major, 6 minor). Blood transfusion was required in 5% (2 patients). The median stay was 4 post-operative nights (range 1–25 nights). In those patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, the mean number of nodes taken was fifteen (range 8–26 nodes). The pathological staging was FIGO stage I 76% (29 patients), stage II 8% (3 patients), stage III 16% (6 patients). The pathological grade was G1 31% (16 patients), G2 45% (17 patients), G3 24% (8 patients).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be safely carried out in patients at high risk for surgery, with no compromise in terms of outcomes, whilst providing all the benefits inherent in minimal access surgery.

Background

The gold standard for staging and preliminary treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is surgical [1]. Surgery consists of laparotomy, peritoneal washings, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy or sampling. The role of lymphadenectomy has been dependant on histology, radiological findings, and local policy.

Traditionally, surgical staging has been carried out through laparotomy. In recent years several studies have demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach to surgery for EC results in outcomes comparable to or better than laparotomy [26]. The benefits of laparoscopic surgery for EC may include reduced post-operative pain and analgesic requirements; earlier return of bowel function; shorter hospital stay; and earlier return to daily activities [710].

Obese patients and those with medical comorbidities are at greater risk of complications [11]. We describe our experience of laparoscopic surgery for EC in a high risk series of patients referred to a gynaecological cancer centre.

Methods

A retrospective search of the medical case notes and the Electronic Patient Records provided the data. Besides demographic statistics, patient details recorded included parity, body mass index (BMI) and any comorbid conditions. The type of operation, intra- and post-operative complications and details of histopathological grade and stage were also recorded.

All patients had pre-operative pelvic and abdominal CT or MRI scan, and each case was discussed at a regular Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting. Operations were performed by a gynaecological oncologist or a sub-specialty trainee with the consultant in attendance. Histological reporting included depth of myometrial invasion and nodal status.

A standard 4-port approach was employed. All patients had peritoneal washing taken at the start of the procedure. The policy is to perform laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies. However, due to obesity and poor access in this group of patients, this was not always possible. In some cases the cervix was only visible with a hysteroscope; in these women a laparoscopic total hysterectomy was performed using a MacCartney tube. If there is macroscopic intraperitoneal disease, then our policy is to convert to laparotomy.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in those who were randomised to the ASTEC trial [12]. For those patients who declined to enter the ASTEC trial, then all those with stage Ic grade 3 cancers and above on radiological and histopathological review underwent lymphadenectomy. Lymph node sampling was performed instead of pelvic lymphadenectomy in cases with severe co-morbidity, or not at all. By sampling we mean a limited lymphadenectomy, without stripping the vessels. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy for EC was not routinely performed in this series.

Results

The median age was 62 years (range 38–82 years). The average BMI was 31 (range 19–67). Nine patients (24%) were nulliparous.

This group of patients had a number of comorbid conditions; fifteen patients (40%) had a single comorbid condition, seven (18%) had two, and a further seven patients (18%) had more than two.

Twenty four patients (63%) were overweight with a BMI of 25 or more (table 1). Seventeen patients (45%) had a BMI greater than 30. Hypertension was present in fifteen patients (40%); eight patients (21%) had previous intraabdominal pathology or surgery; and five patients (13%) had cardiovascular disease (table 1). Other comorbidities included thyroid disease, breast cancer, thromboembolic disease, respiratory disease and diabetes mellitus (table 1).
Table 1

Comorbid conditions

Comorbidity

Patients

Overweight (BMI >25)

24 (63%)

Obese (BMI >30)

17 (45%)

Hypertension

15 (40%)

Severe endometriosis/previous peritonitis/previous abdominal surgery

8 (21%)

Cardiovascular disease

5 (13%)

Thyroid disease

4 (11%)

Breast cancer

5 (13%)

Thromboembolic disease

3 (8%)

Respiratory disease

3 (8%)

Diabetes mellitus

2 (5%)

There were 27 (71%) laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and 11 (29%) total laparoscopic hysterectomies. Lymphadenectomy or lymph node sampling was performed in 25 patients (66%). The median node count for lymphadenectomy was 15 (range 8–26 nodes). Positive nodes were found in four patients (11%), two who had lymph node sampling and two who had lymphadenectomy.

The surgical stage of the patients is shown in table 2. Twelve patients (31%) had grade 1 disease, 17 (45%) had grade 2 disease, and the remaining nine (24%) had grade three lesions. The pathological type was predominantly endometrioid (table 3). Three patients (8%) had positive peritoneal washings. Myometrial invasion and cervical involvement are shown in table 4.
Table 2

FIGO stage on final histology

Stage

 

Sub-stage

 

I

29 (76%)

Ia

11 (29%)

  

Ib

14 (37%)

  

Ic

4 (11%)

II

3 (8%)

IIa

1 (2%)

  

IIb

2 (5%)

III

6 (16%)

IIIa

2 (5%)

  

IIIb

0

  

IIIc

4 (11%)

IV

0

  
Table 3

Pathological type

Pathological type

Patients

Endometrioid

30 (79%)

Serous papillary

3 (8%)

Clear cell/mixed mullerian/mixed endometrioid +serous papillary/mixed serous papillary + clear cell/intraepithelial

5 (13%)

Table 4

Myometrial and cervical involvement

Myometrial invasion

 

Patients

 

None

9 (24%)

 

<50%

16 (42%)

 

>50%

13 (34%)

Cervical involvement

  
 

Stromal

2 (5%)

 

Glandular

1 (2%)

The median operative duration was 210 minutes (range 70–360 minutes). The median estimated blood loss was 200 ml (range 50–1000 ml). Blood transfusion was necessary in two patients (5%). None of the laparoscopic cases needed to be converted into open procedures and there were no incidents of intra-operative visceral damage. The median length of stay was four post-operative nights (range 1 – 25 nights).

There were a total of eight post-operative complications, two of which were major (table 5).
Table 5

Post-operative complications

Major complications

 

Patients

 

Renal failure secondary to diclofenac use (reversible)

1

 

Infected lymphocyst

1

Minor complications

  
 

Unexplained vomiting

1

 

Superficial umbilical wound breakdown

1

 

Extensive bruising of anterior abdominal wall

1

 

Pyrexia of unknown origin

3

Discussion

This series of patients had a large number of comorbidities, particularly with regard to obesity. It might be expected that these patients would have more intra-operative complications (due to difficulties with access) and more post-operative complications (due to comorbid conditions) than patients with fewer risk factors for surgery. Here we have demonstrated that this is not the case. These results show that EC patients perceived to be poor risk for a major surgical procedure can be safely staged using laparoscopic methods. It has been shown that obese patients with EC can benefit from surgery via the laparoscopic route compared with laparotomy in terms of a reduced blood loss, less post-operative pain and a shorter hospital stay [13]. A recent small audit of 4 morbidly obese (BMI >40) women found that laparoscopic total hysterectomy was safe in these patients [14].

With regard to other published series of EC patients operated on laparoscopically, our data compare favourably in terms of post-operative complications, intra-operative blood loss, duration of surgery, and length of post-operative stay [7, 13, 15]. The two major post-operative complications seen here (renal failure secondary to diclofenac use and an infected lymphocyst) were both successfully managed conservatively. The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hysterectomy in this group of high-risk patients is demonstrated by the zero conversion to laparotomy, and the absence of intraoperative complications. Postoperative blood transfusion was minimal, and where blood loss was greater than 300 ml, this invariably occurred in the vaginal part of the hysterectomy.

Lymph node counts following pelvic lymphadenectomy were similar to those seen in other studies utilising the laparoscopic approach [7, 13, 15]. Lymph node sampling was performed in patients in whom a shorter anaesthetic was desirable. With increasing experience of laparoscopic techniques, operating times will be further reduced. In any case, all patients with positive lymph nodes following either sampling or pelvic lymphadenectomy are offered adjuvant, extended field radiotherapy. The role of lymphadenectomy in women with endometrial cancer will become clearer when the results of the ASTEC study [12] are reported.

We believe our study is important, as obesity is a growing epidemic in the UK and other developed nations. It has been shown that a cohort of obese patients with EC have a greater risk of hypertension, diabetes and pulmonary disease than patients with EC who are not obese [16]. As we see more and more obese patients in our clinics, the challenge to gynaecologists and anaesthetists in treating these patients with multiple medical co-morbidities is increasing.

These data are limited by patient numbers. Now that a laparoscopic approach is established in the staging and primary treatment of EC, we can continue to build on our early experience.

Conclusion

Women with EC are often high-risk surgical candidates. Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be safely carried out in these patients with no compromise in terms of outcomes, whilst providing all the benefits inherent in minimal access surgery.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital

References

  1. Creasman WT, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Benedet JL, Heintz AP, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S: Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. International journal of gynecology and obstetrics. 2003, 83: 79-10.1016/S0020-7292(03)90116-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2005, 12: 130-10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Z. H, Jabor A, Bartos P, Eim J, Urbanek S, Pivovarnikova R: Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study. European journal of gynaecological oncology. 2002, 23: 305-Google Scholar
  4. Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival. Gynecologic oncology. 2004, 92: 789-10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim DY, Kim MK, Kim JH, Suh DS, Kim YM, Kim YT, Mok JE, Nam JH: Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients with stage I and II endometrial cancer. International journal of gynecological cancer. 2005, 15: 932-10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00157.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sobiczewski P, Bidzinski M, Derlatka P, Danska-Bidzinska A, Gmyrek J, Panek G: Comparison of the results of surgical treatment using laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer. International journal of gynecological cancer. 2005, 15: 946-10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00158.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Garafano LL: Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma. Cancer. 2001, 91: 378-10.1002/1097-0142(20010115)91:2<378::AID-CNCR1012>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A: Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy?[see comment]. Gynecologic oncology. 2005, 97: 4-10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.12.048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rouzier R, Pomel C: Update on the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of gynaecological malignancy. Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology. 2005, 17: 77-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuoppala T, Tomas E, Heinonen PK: Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2004, 270: 25-10.1007/s00404-003-0488-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Foley K, Lee RB: Surgical complications of obese patients with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic oncology. 1990, 39: 171-10.1016/0090-8258(90)90427-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. ASTEC: A Study in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer. A randomised trial of lymphadenectomy and of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. [http://www.ctu.mrc.ac.uk/studies/documents/ASTECv3.pdf]
  13. Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Garafano LL: Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?. Gynecologic oncology. 2000, 78: 329-10.1006/gyno.2000.5914.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yu CK, Cutner A, Mould T, Olaitan A: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy as a primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer in morbidly obese women. BJOG. 2005, 112: 115-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A: Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer--a prospective randomized trial. Gynecologic oncology. 2001, 80: 239-10.1006/gyno.2000.6069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. World Health Organisation: Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. 2003, , WHO technical report, Series 916: 61-Google Scholar

Copyright

© Willis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement